District Court of Appeal of Florida August 28, 2002, No. 3D01-1844 (Hernandez v. State)

Also known as

United States · · · 28-08-2002

ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

PER CURIAM.

As the trial court has certified after unsuccessful efforts to re-establish the record under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), and as the state agrees, material omissions in the transcript of testimony make meaningful appellate review of the trial below impossible. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for new trial is granted. See Delap v.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.