Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit July 19, 2002, 01-71735 (Raymond E. Hill v. State of Alaska)
Also known as
United States · · · 19-07-2002
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to decide whether an initial habeas petition challenging the calculation of the prisoner’s release date, in this case a claim that Alaska’s “mandatory parole” scheme is unconstitutional, is governed by the “second or successive” petition provision of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
*897
(AEDPA).
See
28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit