Court of Appeals of Minnesota March 11, 2003, C9-02-1365 (Thul v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 11-03-2003
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Steven M. Thul challenges the denial of his petition for posteonviction relief for violating City of Ham Lake, Minn., City Code § 9-470 (2000). The posteonviction court determined that the ordinance at issue did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and was not constitutionally void for vagueness.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit