Court of Appeals of Minnesota June 10, 2003, C5-02-1718 (State v. Cunningham)
Also known as
United States · · · 10-06-2003
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellants challenge the trial court’s imposition of the $28 co-payment required by
*9
Minn.Stat. § 611.17(c) (2002). They argue that the co-payment infringes on then-rights to counsel and equal protection under the Minnesota and United States Constitutions, and that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the co-payment on appellants.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit