Court of Appeals of Oregon February 19, 2003, 001186; A112775 (State v. Burdick)
Also known as
United States · · · 19-02-2003
*462
KISTLER, J.
Based on his conditional guilty plea, defendant was convicted of possessing a controlled substance. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statements. He reasons that the officers were required to give him
Miranda
warnings before questioning him. We reverse and remand.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit