Court of Appeals of Washington June 3, 2003, No. 28438-3-II (State v. Xaviar)
Also known as
United States · · · 03-06-2003
Seinfeld, J.
Michal Xaviar contends that the prosecutor breached the State’s plea agreement by commenting at his sentencing hearing about the egregious nature of the crime and describing potential aggravating factors. He also contends that under Apprendi v. New Jersey,1 the State must prove to a jury the existence of aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit