Court of Appeals of Washington December 23, 2003, No. 21710-8-III (State v. Silva)
Also known as
United States · · · 23-12-2003
Sweeney, J.
With a few narrowly construed exceptions, the State may not use a criminal defendant’s postarrest silence as substantive evidence of guilt. Here, police induced Carlos Silva to begin talking by assuring him that he could assert his right to remain silent at any time without penalty. After Mr.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit