Court of Appeals of Arizona February 6, 2003, No. 1 CA-CV 02-0249 (Demko v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance)

OPINION

WINTHROP, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal arises from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee. The central issue is whether Appellant can collect UIM benefits under an insur*498anee policy provided by Appellee or whether Appellee’s definition of “underinsured vehicle,” which excludes vehicles covered under the liability potion of such policy, is a valid means to prevent