Ohio Supreme Court July 18, 2003, 1988-0351 (State v. Cooey)
Also known as
United States · · · 18-07-2003
Summit App. No. CA12943. Upon consideration of appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file a pro se motion to suspend S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(A)(1) and appellant’s pro se motion to suspend S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(A)(1),
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions be, and hereby are, denied.
Moyer, C.J. and O’Donnell, J., dissent.
O’Connor, J., not participating.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit