District Court of Appeal of Florida April 30, 2003, No. 4D02-20 (Ingrassia v. Thompson)
Also known as
United States · · · 30-04-2003
lead-opinion
MAY, J.
The defendant filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the trial court’s restriction of defense counsel’s questioning on voir dire as an issue on direct appeal. We agree that counsel was ineffective in failing to raise this issue and grant the petition.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit