District Court of Appeal of Florida May 21, 2003, No. 3D02-304 (Echevarria v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 21-05-2003
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
Because the state was indisputably in serious, material, and inexcusable breach of its agreement not to oppose the appellant’s parole applications in return for his completely satisfied promise to plead guilty to reduced charges and testify in trial against the co-defendant,1 there is no choice under the law but to reverse the denial of 3.850 relief below, see State v.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit