Supreme Court of Connecticut May 6, 2003, SC 16700 (Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.)

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal involves the viability of the doctrine of superseding cause. The plaintiffs, Neil Barry, Diana Barry, Bernard Cohade and Lynn Cohade,1 appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the named defendant, Quality Steel Products, Inc. (Quality Steel), and the defendant Ring’s End, Inc. (Ring’s End).