Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit July 14, 2003, No. 01-2384 (United States v. Cork)

PER CURIAM.

Kyle Cork appeals his conviction for two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Cork challenges his conviction on the grounds that: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support a guilty verdict, (2) the district court committed error by admitting certain evidence at trial and (3) Cork’s trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel.