Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit October 20, 2003, No. 02-55725; D.C. No. CV-99-00396-SVW (Calderon v. Castro)
Also known as
United States · · · 20-10-2003
*622MEMORANDUM *
Appellant Jose Mauricio Calderon asserts that his due process rights were violated because the jury instructions did not mirror his “antecedent threat” defense. However, the panoply of self-defense instructions given by the trial court adequately covered Calderon’s theory in light of the evidence presented. See Duckett v. Godinez, 67 F.3d 734, 746 (9th Cir.1995).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit