South Dakota Supreme Court May 21, 2003, None (Esling v. Krambeck)

Also known as

United States · · · 21-05-2003

.SABERS, Justice,

(dissenting).

[¶ 32.] I dissent because the actions of the City and County in this case were unreasonable and illegal.

[¶ 33.] 1. The City and County improperly diluted the value of Es-ling’s property by including the airport property in the valuation.

[¶ 34.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.