West Virginia Supreme Court December 8, 2003, 31540, 31541 and 31564 (State Ex Rel. Cities of Charleston v. West Virginia Economic Development Authority)

ALBRIGHT, Justice,

concurring.

I write separately to make two points.

First, I do not believe that a “lottery” is fully described by syllabus point one, State ex ret. Mountaineer Park v. Polan, or syllabus point four, State v. Hudson, adopted as syllabus points six and seven in the Court’s opinion in the case sub judice.