Court of Appeals of Minnesota July 13, 2004, A03-1634 (Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus)

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant argues that the issues litigated in this proceeding were not identical to those previously litigated in another proceeding and challenges the district court’s use of collateral estoppel to grant respondent summary judgment. Because we find that appellant attempts to relitigate an issue identical to that decided previously, we affirm.