Supreme Court of Pennsylvania February 17, 2004, 33 WAP 2001-53 WAP 2001 (Behers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review)
Also known as
United States · · · 17-02-2004
OPINION
JUSTICE CASTILLE.
The issue raised in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth Court was correct in looking beyond the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (the CBA) to determine what conduct constitutes a disruption of status quo in an unemployment compensation case. Today, we reaffirm our holding in
Miceli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Quaker Oats Co.),
519 Pa.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit