Missouri Court of Appeals February 3, 2004, No. ED 82527 (Schmitt v. State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Conrad Schmitt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. Schmitt’s claim that post-conviction counsel abandoned him is without merit. Counsel timely filed an amended motion, and Schmitt was granted an evidentiary hearing on several of the claims therein. The fact that the motion’s content was poor and failed to obtain relief does not amount to abandonment. See State v.