Court of Appeals of Kansas October 1, 2004, No. 91,310 (U.S.D. No. 215 v. McGlynn)
Also known as
United States · · · 01-10-2004
Elliott, J.:
Peggy McGlynn, Tom Bachman, Karen Burden, Jan Schiffelbein, and Dan Woellhof (Teachers) appeal the trial court’s decision holding the extended days in the individual contracts were supplemental and not subject to due process procedures under K.S.A. 72-5436 et seq., the Due Process Procedure Act.
We affirm.
The facts are not disputed.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit