District Court of Appeal of Florida June 16, 2004, No. 3D03-3065 (S.S.M. v. State)

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m.