Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit August 18, 2004, No. 03-1458 (SRAM Corp. v. AD-II Engineering, Inc.)

MAYER, Chief Judge,

dissenting.

The court has taken words out of context, imported a limitation from the written description into the claims, and crafted a surprising result. The court’s biggest mistake is its failure to read SRAM’s December 6, 1996 amendment with care.