Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit September 29, 2004, No. 03-55709; D.C. No. CV-00-00124-GEB (Gupta v. Green)

MEMORANDUM**

*993Gupta was fully advised, in accord with Rand v. Rowland,1 of the need to furnish a sworn statement, or other cognizable evidence in support of his retaliation claim, if he was to avoid summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. He did not do so.