Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit September 3, 2004, No. 03-10571; D.C. No. CR 99-10-H-CCL (United States v. Moore)

MEMORANDUM ***

Moore claims that the imposition of the “no fishing” restriction was unlawful. The district court has wide discretion to impose conditions of supervised release. United States v. T.M., 330 F.3d 1235, 1240 (9th Cir.2003). Because there was no objection at the time of sentencing, this court reviews for plain error. United States v. Randall, 162 F.3d 557, 561 (9th Cir.1998).