Supreme Court of Missouri May 31, 2005, SC 86363 (Utility Service & Maintenance, Inc. v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.)

Also known as

United States · · · 31-05-2005

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

This case calls for interpretation of an indemnity provision that was part of a contract between two businesses. The trial court held that the indemnity provision was not enforceable. This Court concludes that the provision should be enforced as written and reverses the judgment of the trial court.

Facts and Procedural History

Noranda Aluminum, Inc.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.