Court of Appeals of Minnesota June 7, 2005, A04-1906 (McLaughlin v. Heikkila)
Also known as
United States · · · 07-06-2005
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Appellants brought this action for specific performance of a contract to purchase respondent’s real estate. The district court determined that no contract had been formed between the parties and granted respondent’s motion. to dismiss. Because we see no error of law in the dismissal, we affirm.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit