Court of Appeals of Minnesota August 16, 2005, A04-2350 (Conaway v. St. Louis County)

Also known as

United States · · · 16-08-2005

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

In challenging summary judgment, appellant argues that the district court erred in determining that respondent is entitled to continued health-insurance coverage under Minn.Stat. § 299A.465 (2004) because (1) respondent began suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder before the statute became effective, and the statute cannot be applied retroactively; (2) Minn.Stat.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.