Ohio Court of Appeals November 9, 2005, No. 22575. (State v. Searcy, Unpublished Decision (11-9-2005))

{¶ 15} I dissent based on my previous dissent in State v. Riley, 9th Dist. No. 21852, 2004-Ohio-4880. I would remand, because the trial court did not make the findings necessary to impose consecutive sentences. I agree with the majority, however, that the case should be remanded in regard to sentencing on the third burglary conviction.