District Court of Appeal of Florida March 16, 2005, No. 3D05-374 (Sinclair v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 16-03-2005
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit