District Court of Appeal of Florida November 30, 2005, No. 1D05-1924 (Hyers v. State)

Also known as

United States · · · 30-11-2005

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.