Supreme Court of Pennsylvania September 28, 2005, 22 & 23 EAP 2003 (Commonwealth v. Magliocco)

CONCURRING OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

I join the majority opinion. I write separately to distinguish this case from one in which a citizen in fact relies upon *268an erroneously printed criminal statutory enactment. Such a case, in my view, may implicate different legal concerns than those present in this appeal. See, e.g., John T.