Court of Appeals of Oregon February 15, 2006, 030769; A121592 (Soderholm v. Krueger)

Also known as

United States · · · 15-02-2006

*411

DEITS, J. pro tempore

Respondent appeals after the trial court issued a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) prohibiting him from having any contact with petitioner.

1

Respondent challenges, among other things, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the issuance of the SPO. We review

de novo, Hanzo v.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.