Court of Appeals of Washington August 24, 2006, No. 24211-1-III (State v. Ring)
Also known as
United States · · · 24-08-2006
Schultheis, J.
¶1 Tommy Ray Ring challenges a restitution payment schedule ordered by the trial court and the adequacy and fairness of the proceedings associated with the schedule. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the restitution payment schedule. We further conclude that the proceedings were sufficient and not unfair. Accordingly, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Mr.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit