Ohio Supreme Court November 1, 2006, No. 2005-1631 (State ex rel. Advanced Metal Precision Products v. Industrial Commission)

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We are asked to revisit the definition ascribed to the term “operating cycle” as used in former Ohio Adm.Code Jl^lrl-S-INE).1 Upon review, we conclude that the definition merits a more expansive interpretation than used currently and hold that “operating cycle” includes both intentional and accidental press activation by the machine’s operator.