Court of Appeals of Oregon February 15, 2006, 0205-33049; A120902 (State v. Maddox)

Also known as

United States · · · 15-02-2006

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of two counts of delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance, and two counts of possession of a Schedule I controlled substance. ORS 475.992. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence found in his vehicle. We reject defendant’s arguments on that issue without discussion.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.