Oregon Supreme Court December 7, 2006, CC 03CV0551; CA A125029; SC S53276 (Hamilton v. Paynter)
Also known as
United States · · · 07-12-2006
*50
DE MUNIZ, C. J.
In this case, we consider whether a payment to an injured party tolled the statute of limitations. The trial court dismissed the action, because it concluded that the payment did not toll the statute. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
Hamilton v. Paynter,
204 Or App 119, 129 P3d 203 (2006).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit