Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 16, 2006, No. 05-35470 (Harrell v. Kepreos)

MEMORANDUM **

Peter T. Harrell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his diversity action on the ground that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s determination that it does not have personal jurisdiction over a de*794fendant. Dole Food Co., Inc. v. Watts, 303 F.