Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 29, 2006, Nos. 06-30142, 06-30164 (United States v. Winishut)

MEMORANDUM *

The government appeals, arguing that the district court committed clear error when it found that defendant Joseph Winishut exhibited exceptional remorse and rehabilitation, and that Winishut’s ultimate sentence was unreasonable. Winishut cross-appeals, arguing that the government ignored its duty to advocate for a sentence conforming to the law. We affirm.