Supreme Court of Pennsylvania June 19, 2006, 33 MAP 2004 (Touloumes v. E.S.C. Inc.)
Also known as
United States · · · 19-06-2006
*299Justice NEWMAN,
dissenting.
I dissent from the Majority Opinion because Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 238 (Pa.R.C.P.238) expressly provides for delay damages in actions involving property damages: “[a]t the request of the plaintiff in a civil action seeking monetary relief for bodily injury, death or property damage, damages for delay shall be added to the amount of compensatory
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit