Court of Appeals of Minnesota February 23, 2007, A05-2410 (State v. Hager)

Also known as

United States · · · 23-02-2007

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant David Hager challenges his convictions of receiving stolen property, aiding an offender, and obstructing legal process. Appellant contends that the district court’s jury instructions on aiding an offender and obstructing legal process were prejudicially erroneous, that his conviction for possession of stolen property is not supported by sufficient evidence, and

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.