District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania May 31, 2007, Civil Action 05-1348 (Cindrich v. Fisher)

Also known as

United States · · · 31-05-2007

OPINION and ORDER OF COURT

DONETTA W. AMBROSE, Chief Judge.

SYNOPSIS

Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 10). Defendants move for summary judgment as to: 1) Count One because Plaintiff was not a whistleblower under Pennsylvania law and because no actions were taken against her because of any whistleblowing activity; 2) Counts Two and Three because: a) Plaintiffs

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.