Washington Supreme Court July 12, 2007, No. 76533-2 (State v. Young)

Also known as

United States · · · 12-07-2007

lead-opinion

¶1 In a pretrial hearing, the trial court determined that hearsay statements were admissible as excited utterances even though the declarant later recanted the statements, the circumstances surrounding the statements provided the only corroboration that a startling event occurred, and minor discrepancies existed in the witnesses’ testimony about the content of the statements.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.