Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit January 23, 2007, Nos. 2006-1236, 2006-1247 (Eberle Design, Inc. v. Reno A & E)

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Appellant Reno A & E did not move for judgment as a matter of law at the close of all the evidence and thus failed, under then-applicable principles of Ninth Circuit law, to preserve its right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal. See Janes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 279 F.3d 883, 886-87 (9th Cir.2002).