North Dakota Supreme Court March 22, 2007, 20060184 (State v. Mulske)

combined-opinion

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Mulske appeals the district court judgment after a jury found him guilty of theft. Concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion by failing to appoint new counsel for Mulske and

*130

hold a hearing to inquire whether he waived his right to testify, we affirm;

I

[¶ 2] In December 2005, the State charged Mulske with theft of an