Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit April 12, 2007, 2006-1260, 2006-1437 (Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corporation)

MOORE, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

I agree with the majority’s holding in all respects save one. I write separately to voice my disagreement with the majority’s holding that the district court properly construed “transverse holes” in claim 1 of the '444 patent to mean “holes across the butt portion of the nail.