Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit September 27, 2007, 06-6474, 06-6539, 07-5059 (Harbison v. Bell)

Also known as

United States · · · 27-09-2007

CLAY, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

I dissented with respect to the prior panel opinion in this matter, Harbison v. Bell, 408 F.3d 823 (6th Cir.2005), because the district court improperly failed to grant Harbison’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the prosecution violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.