Superior Court of Pennsylvania August 24, 2007 (Nash v. Herbster)

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Like the Majority, I am constrained to conclude that the recent amendment to Pa.R.C.P.1910.19(f) requires this Court to vacate and remand. I write separately only to emphasize that, on remand, the trial court retains the discretion under that Rule to determine whether Appellant’s support obligation should be modified or terminated.