Ohio Court of Appeals June 30, 2009, No. 22888 (Paxson v. City of Dayton)

lead-opinion

Brogan, Judge.

{¶ 1} Mark S. Paxson appeals from the trial court’s final order affirming a decision of the Dayton Civil Service Board, which upheld the termination of his employment for violating a city residence requirement.

{¶ 2} Paxson advances three assignments of error on appeal. First, he contends that the trial court erred in not holding that R.C. 9.