Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit May 20, 2009, No. 07-56311 (United States v. Premo)

*170MEMORANDUM *

In this qui tam action, the Relator, Charolette Bly-Magee (“Bly-Magee”) appeals the district court’s dismissal without leave to amend her Third Amended Complaint. . We have jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court dismissed Bly-Magee’s Third Amended Complaint because it lacked adequate specificity, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b).