District Court, W.D. Michigan January 26, 2009, No. 1:07-CV-993 (Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.)

OPINION

GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.

Plaintiffs (collectively, “Adams”) have filed a Motion to Strike Defendants’ Fifth and Sixth Defenses and to Dismiss Counterclaims V and V (sic, VI), or in the Alternative for a More Definite Statement. (Docket no. 86.) Defendants’ (collectively, “Perrigo’s”) fifth defense alleges that Adams’s patent, U.S. Patent No.